The NLTP Act 1989: A Boon or a Bane for Nagaland?

The Nagaland Liquor Total Prohibition (NLTP) Act of 1989 has been a subject of intense debate in our society. Recent investigations and surveys, particularly by Tokavi K Zhimo, have gathered insights from various stakeholders, including church leaders, law enforcement, medical professionals, and students. The consensus among proponents of the Act is that lifting it could lead to significant social repercussions, adversely affecting innocent lives.

Social Concerns: Advocates for the continuation of the NLTP Act argue that alcohol abuse is a catalyst for domestic violence, public disorder, addiction, and health risks, particularly among the youth. They emphasise that without stringent regulations, society could face escalating issues related to alcohol consumption, undermining cultural values and public safety. The absence of oversight allows underground markets to flourish, exacerbating these problems.

Church leaders have called for regular awareness campaigns to educate the community about the dangers of alcohol. For instance, a case highlighted in Kohima involved a 25 year old diagnosed with chronic liver disease due to alcohol use, showcasing the severe health implications tied to substance abuse.

Economic Alternatives: From an economic perspective, proponents suggest that the government should divert its focus from alcohol-related revenue to other sustainable projects. They advocate for the revival of local industries, such as sugar mills, and the promotion of cultural events like the Hornbill Festival to boost the state’s economy. Additionally, branding local products, such as chemical-free rice beer, could enhance the state’s reputation and generate income without the adverse effects associated with alcohol.

Moreover, there is a strong call for the government to ensure that funds allocated from the central government are used judiciously and without corruption. Ethical considerations also arise, particularly concerning donations to churches from individuals involved in the black market.

The Argument for Change: Conversely, there are voices advocating for a re-evaluation of the NLTP Act. Critics point to historical examples, such as the failures of alcohol prohibition in the UK before World War II and the legal sale of marijuana in the Netherlands, as evidence that prohibition may not be the answer. They argue that Nagaland has a long-standing cultural relationship with alcohol, and with proper regulation and education, this relationship can be harmonised with modern values.

Proponents of lifting the Act suggest that regulated availability of alcohol could eliminate the black market, ensuring that consumers have access to safe and quality products. With proper guidelines and community involvement, they argue that responsible consumption can be achieved.

A Path Forward: The debate surrounding the NLTP Act raises critical questions about public health, cultural values, and economic sustainability. To navigate these challenges, it is crucial to engage community organisations in decision-making processes and prioritise education about responsible alcohol consumption. Initiatives like Project Reet and Nasha Mukh Bharat can play vital roles in raising awareness and providing the necessary information to combat the harmful effects of alcohol.

In conclusion, whether the NLTP Act remains or is lifted, the focus should be on creating a balanced approach that prioritises public health and safety while respecting cultural practices. A thoughtful dialogue involving all stakeholders will be essential in shaping a future that addresses the complexities of alcohol consumption in Nagaland.

Tokavi K Zhimo

Zunheboto