Rajya Sabha passes bill to tag individuals as terrorists

New Delhi, Aug. 2 (IANS): A Bill amending the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, which allows the government to tag an individual as terrorist, was passed by the Rajya Sabha on Friday with a move by opposition parties to send it to a House panel getting defeated. As a division was called for by some members during the Bill's passage, 147 members voted in favour and 42 against it. The Lok Sabha has already passed the Bill, under which the government can designate individuals as terrorists if the person commits or participates in acts of terrorism, prepares for or promotes terror or is otherwise involved in terrorism. Replying to the debate, Home Minister Amit Shah said earlier that it is important to name terrorists individually as it had been seen that when terrorist organisations were banned, the terrorists floated another outfit. He also said that countries like the US, Israel, Pakistan and China designate individuals as terrorists. Many opposition parties opposed the provision, saying this could be misused. Congress leader P Chidambaram said that tagging an organisation as a terrorist was different from branding an individual. He stressed that the provision violated individual liberty. "Let me caution you, the government, that it will be struck down. Instead of listening to us here and making the necessary correction, you are forcing us to go about a kilometre away to another building (Supreme Court) and present (the case) to another set of individuals. "How does it raise the esteem of Parliament? We are doing something which is hopelessly unconstitutional," the former Union Minister said, adding that the Bill should be sent to a Select Committee. Among other key provisions, the Bill empowers the Director-General of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to grant approval for seizure or attachment of property when a case is being investigated by the agency. The existing law requires the investigating officer to obtain prior approval of the state police chief to seize properties linked to terrorism. The government is of the view that on many occasions, terror accused own properties in different states. In such circumstances, seeking approval of state police chiefs causes delay and hampers investigation. While the Congress has endorsed most amendments in the Bill, it stoutly opposed the clause that empowers the government to designate an individual as terrorist. Chidambaram said that Pakistan-based Lashkar chief Hafiz Saeed and activist Gautam Navlakha, who has been arrested for the Bhima Koregaon violence, cannot be compared. Home Minister Shah clarified that a person cannot be designated a terrorist on assumption and belief as argued by the opposition leaders. He said there would be a four-stage scrutiny before any individual is tagged as a terrorist. Speaking first on the Bill, Elamaram Kareem of the CPI-M opposed it. He said that in the name of combating terrorism, the government was imposing state terrorism on people.

Parliament passes Bill to repeal 58 obsolete laws

The Rajya Sabha on Friday passed a Bill to repeal 58 obsolete and irrelevant laws. Considered a major clean-up act of the statute book by the Modi government, the move is set to ensure smooth administration and good governance. Replying to the debate on the Repealing and Amending Bill, 2019, Union Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said there was a need to periodically review and scrutinise laws which serve no purpose in the country. The Bill to repeal the archaic laws has already been passed by the Lok Sabha. Introducing the Bill in the Upper House, the Minister said that 1,428 bills including various amendments have so far been repealed. The process would continue to repeal more such laws. "I would urge the House that this is the initiative in the right direction. I would urge this House and through this House the entire country and state governments that periodic review of obsolete and irrelevant laws must become a part of good governance," the minister said. The laws proposed to be repealed include those from 1860 and 1870. The Law Minister said that the country should not be burdened with obsolete laws. Further continuation of such laws affects ease of doing business, ease of living and ease of governance. The government had earlier set up a committee which identified the laws to be repealed.