The contemporary Nagas have indulged ourselves with various modes of discussions that have appeared to be of calculative nature, and even though ‘genuine embracing’ without reason may seem to be easy going and pampering, the former has shed more light of perspectives in having clarity and clinging to what is right and wrong – after all, without the sense of right and wrong what establishment of legal justice system could yield befitting insurance of justice.
In the present, in instances while instigating residual public statements having discoursed in different time-frame of the past (to avoid confusion and disproportion of present consolidation) in the matters of consummation or legitimacy, should have credential base of claim, as to reciprocate and certify the extent the concordant (for public consummation) were discussed, and having mentioned received—It’s due share of criticism… the manner of process and the points achieved while criticisms were exchanged, that even if there never were a conclusive assailment that could withstand and validate presentation upon further point of time – on either or all the quarters, had there been areas where the discussion albeit saturated but/or inconclusive had a track of manageable dilation of accounts that had been perceived or conceived among the parties during the trails, and could be produced (subtly/unsubtly, and could be substantiated) – thus relieving any doubts in any contingency point when to or at the least restating or addressing the significance of such claims, especially when being presented as a posit to be addressed about…in subjects that has more matured viewpoints and more progressed set of quantity and qualitative variables afflicted with general perception otherwise not yet evolved during the episode of past discourses, should be prioritized.
Nagas cannot afford to retrograde more in the fine tune of current manifestation of our reality where people have been downsized to be pawns with no conscience for exploration and aspirations but to slumber down and feed off from designs where questions aren’t sought but repressed as we have been for decades. The people being left out from the network of our own entitlement in establishing our future, recognizable apparently in the patterns of our reality which has made the people into imbibing a supposition of reality (defying and denying natural justice) where our rights have been made second to some… it is indeed unfortunate being succumbed and we have paid our dues.
Where the stand of politics as a medium of production alone has been sensibly confirmed for comprehension and every section of Naga has their rights resided in all spheres of unprejudiced diversity for common growth – pertaining to the recent outcry of involving the people to also partake while a solution for the people is to be framed, by involving people’s representative to ensure accountability to the people, if any section of people of Nagaland does not concur to this motion, it would be relevant to make a public statement regarding this context and explain to the people what the alternative measures and routes are where and why without the involvement of the people, could harbor better and effective prospects in the interest of the people.
The minds of the Naga can afford calculations; we seek not conjectures of chaos transcribed affinitive to sublimation but incipient of suppression in subtle realms; we seek for meaningful quest of understandable exploration where equality triumphs and synchronizes along with our pursuit for progress, and reaching out to people across the globe for common cause.
