Appointment of Non-Naga as GB in Dimapur’s New Market Area: Imperative for Immediate Revocation to Preserve Naga Customary Law

Introduction

Dimapur, a prominent city in Nagaland, has long been a cultural and commercial hub for the Naga people. The appointment of Gaon Buras (GBs) hold significant importance in preserving Naga customary law and traditions within Dimapur. However, the appointment of Non-Naga of questionable ancestry who’s apparently a bonafide resident of Khatkhati (Karbi Anglong, Assam) as GB in the New Market Area raises serious concerns about the erosion of Naga culture and the influence of Non-Naga residents, particularly Illegal Bangladeshi Immigrants (IBIs). This article explores the historical context of Dimapur’s tribal belt status, the issue of patronising culture, the significance of GBs in Naga society, the consequences of appointing non-Nagas to this revered position and the critical need for immediate revocation of these appointments to safeguard Naga customs.

Dimapur as a Tribal Belt

Dimapur, formerly a sub-division, gained the status of a tribal belt through a government notification issued on November 21, 1971. This designation was aimed at protecting and preserving the unique culture and traditions of the Naga tribes inhabiting the area. One of the key pillars of this preservation effort was the appointment of GBs, who would serve as the custodians of Naga customary law within the city.

The Concerns of Patronising Culture

The issue of patronising culture deeply rooted in Nagaland, particularly in Dimapur, raises concerns about the preservation of Naga customary laws. Dimapur’s strategic location and economic opportunities have attracted people from various backgrounds, including fellow Nagas and non-Naga residents, such as IBIs. While cultural exchange can be enriching, it can also lead to the dilution of Naga traditions.

At the heart of this issue lies the appointment of GBs. GBs have traditionally been entrusted with the responsibility of safeguarding Naga customs and ensuring their continuity. However, the appointment of Non-Nagas as GBs jeopardises this role. Non-Nagas GBs may lack a deep understanding of Naga culture and traditions, potentially leading to misinterpretations and a loss of cultural authenticity.

One of the most troubling aspects of this situation is the apparent endorsement of this patronising culture by some individuals within the Naga community. It is disheartening to witness Naga supporters of Non-Naga GBs openly supporting the prevalence of IBIs in Dimapur, often using them as vote banks. This not only reflects a lack of understanding but also raises questions about the integrity of the custodians of Naga culture. Allotting illegal rights and entitlements to IBIs for political gains undermines the very essence of Naga identity and tradition.

Historically, the responsibility for addressing this issue does not lie solely with local politicians but also with administrators and the broader community. The alarming and unprecedented growth of the IBI population in Dimapur can be attributed to past local politicians who, instead of safeguarding Naga interests, engaged in vote bank politics by exploiting the vulnerability of the immigrant population. This shortsighted approach has put the future generations of Nagas at risk.

To address this problem effectively, it is crucial for the Naga society to unite and refocus its efforts on preserving its unique culture and heritage. This includes reevaluating the role of GBs and ensuring that they are dedicated to upholding Naga customary laws without compromise. Moreover, the political leadership should prioritise the welfare and interests of the Naga people over short-term electoral gains.

The Role of GBs in Naga Society

Gaon Buras, often referred to as village headmen or elders, play a pivotal role in Naga society. They are responsible for upholding and enforcing Naga customary law, resolving disputes within the village, and maintaining peace and order. GBs are not mere administrators; they are the living repositories of Naga culture, passing down traditions, oral histories, and social norms from one generation to the next. Their position is more than just a bureaucratic role; it is a sacred responsibility that binds Naga communities together.

The Threat of Appointing Non-Nagas as GBs

The appointment of Non-Nagas as GBs poses a grave threat to the preservation of Naga customary law and culture for several reasons:

• Loss of Cultural Authenticity: GBs are expected to embody and protect Naga culture. When non-Nagas are appointed to these positions, there is a risk of dilution and misinterpretation of Naga traditions, as these individuals may lack a deep understanding of the customs and values that underpin Naga society.

• Erosion of Trust: Trust is a fundamental element in the relationship between GBs and the villagers. Appointing Non-Nagas as GBs can erode this trust, leading to disputes, social unrest, and a breakdown of community cohesion.

• Legal and Ethical Concerns: Such appointments may violate Naga customary laws and traditional norms, raising legal and ethical questions about the legitimacy of decisions made by Non-Naga GBs.

• Loss of Cultural Continuity: GBs are instrumental in passing on cultural knowledge to the younger generation. The appointment of Non-Nagas can disrupt this intergenerational transmission, potentially leading to the loss of vital cultural practices and customs.

The Urgent Need for Revocation

To preserve the GBs as traditional custodians of Naga customary law, it is imperative to revoke the  appointments of Non-Nagas and reinstate authentic GBs. This revocation should be carried out through a transparent and consultative process within Naga communities.

Here are some steps to consider

• Community Consultation: Engage the local communities in dialogue to understand their concerns and preferences regarding the appointment of GBs. This will ensure that the decisions are in alignment with the wishes of the people.

• Transparent Review: Conduct a transparent review of the GB appointment in the New Market Area, ensuring that they align with the tribal belt status and respect Naga customary laws.

• Cultural Education: Promote cultural education and awareness programs for all residents, including Non-Naga communities, to foster a deeper understanding and respect for Naga traditions.

• Reaffirming Customary Laws: Reinforce the importance of Naga customary laws and norms, emphasising their role in maintaining social harmony and preserving cultural heritage.

• Education and Training: Provide training and support to newly appointed GBs to enhance their understanding of Naga customs and traditions.

• Legal Framework: Establish a clear legal framework that upholds the tribal belt status and Naga customary laws, while also addressing the concerns related to Non-Naga residents.

Conclusion

The appointment of Non-Naga as GBs in Dimapur’s New Market Area is a pressing issue that threatens the preservation of Naga customary laws and traditions. To protect the rich cultural heritage of the Naga people, it is imperative to revoke these appointments and reinstate GBs who are knowledgeable about and committed to Naga customs. This process should involve active participation from the Naga communities, along with a broader effort to educate and promote cultural awareness among all residents. In doing so, Dimapur can continue to thrive as a diverse city while safeguarding its Naga identity.

Chichanthung Shitiri

Public Servant & Social Entrepreneur

Diphupar, Chumoukedima.